Jm Homecare Services, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 17, 2021
DocketA21A1084
StatusPublished

This text of Jm Homecare Services, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Jm Homecare Services, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jm Homecare Services, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 17, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1084. JM HOMECARE SERVICES, INC. v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

Auto-Owners Insurance Company filed an action against JM Homecare Services, Inc. Joseph Mozie, the registered agent, filed a pro se answer on behalf of JM Homecare. The trial court subsequently informed JM Homecare that it could not represent itself and ordered it to obtain counsel. After JM Homecare failed to do so, the trial court granted Auto-Owner’s motion to strike and entered a judgment in favor of Auto-Owners on August 21, 2020. Mozie then filed a pro se notice of appeal on December 14, 2020. We, however, lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, Mozie is not authorized to file a notice of appeal on behalf of JM Homecare. See Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, 267 Ga. 801, 805 (2) (485 SE2d 22) (1997) (“In this state, only a licensed attorney is authorized to represent a corporation in a proceeding in a court of record . . . .”). Accordingly, because Mozie is not authorized to practice law in this State, the notice of appeal he filed on behalf of JM Homecare is null and void. Second, the notice of appeal was untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6- 38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, Mozie filed the notice of appeal 115 days after the trial court’s order. Consequently, this appeal is untimely. For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/17/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.
485 S.E.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
Rowland v. State
452 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jm Homecare Services, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jm-homecare-services-inc-v-auto-owners-insurance-company-gactapp-2021.