J.J. Juliano Construction, Inc. v. Burgio & Campofelice, Inc.

273 A.D.2d 921, 709 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 921 (J.J. Juliano Construction, Inc. v. Burgio & Campofelice, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.J. Juliano Construction, Inc. v. Burgio & Campofelice, Inc., 273 A.D.2d 921, 709 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in allowing Burgio & Campofelice, Inc. (defendant), the general contractor, to charge plaintiff subcontractor for the amounts defendant expended to correct a defect in the concrete floor of the auditorium that was poured by plaintiff. The subcontract provides that the general contractor must provide notice to the subcontractor that the work is defective as a condition precedent to making the subcontractor liable for damages caused by its defective work. Defendant admitted that it did not provide the requisite notice (see, Sturdy Concrete Corp. v NAB Constr. Corp., 65 AD2d 262, 273-274, appeal dismissed 46 NY2d 938). We therefore modify the judgment in favor of defendant by subtracting the amount of $6,259.45 ($5,443 plus 15% allowed to defendant for overhead and profit) together with interest thereon and otherwise affirm. We have examined the remaining arguments advanced by plaintiff and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Roberts, J.H.O. — Damages.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BAISCH, INC. v. THE PIKE COMPANY, INC.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Baisch, Inc. v. Pike Co.
103 A.D.3d 1259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D.2d 921, 709 N.Y.S.2d 324, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jj-juliano-construction-inc-v-burgio-campofelice-inc-nyappdiv-2000.