Jimenez v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2008·No. 08-1182·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1182

ROSEMARY L. JIMENEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; NEIL ANTHONY GORDON MCPHIE, United States Merit System Protection Board; LINDA M. SPRINGER, United States Office of Personnel Management,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-03228-JFM)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER,* Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosemary L. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Samuel Gordon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer Wright Schick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:

Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order

granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment

discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Jimenez v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-03228-JFM (D.

Md., Nov. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jimenez v. Astrue, (4th Cir. 2008).

Jimenez v. Astrue (Jimenez v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related