Jimenez v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

Jimenez v. Astrue

286 F. App'x 16

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2008·No. No. 08-1182·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jimenez v. Astrue, No. l:06-cv-03228-JFM, 2007 WL 4287580 (D.Md, Nov. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jimenez v. Astrue, No. l:06-cv-03228-JFM, 2007 WL 4287580 (D.Md, Nov. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jimenez v. Astrue, 286 F. App'x 16 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 16 (Jimenez v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.