Jim Shaw, Defendant-Surety v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 02-10-00049-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00049-CV

Jim Shaw, Defendant-Surety

APPELLANT

V.

The State of Texas

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 297th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

----------

On July 9, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response reasonably explaining the failure to timely file a brief.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).  We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  August 5, 2010




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jim Shaw, Defendant-Surety v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Jim Shaw, Defendant-Surety v. State (Jim Shaw, Defendant-Surety v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.