Jill Tinetti v. Lee Wittke, Sheriff Racine County, Jane Doe, a Racine County Matron Whose Name is Unknown, and County of Racine

620 F.2d 160, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18326
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 1980
Docket79-2442
StatusPublished
Cited by91 cases

This text of 620 F.2d 160 (Jill Tinetti v. Lee Wittke, Sheriff Racine County, Jane Doe, a Racine County Matron Whose Name is Unknown, and County of Racine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jill Tinetti v. Lee Wittke, Sheriff Racine County, Jane Doe, a Racine County Matron Whose Name is Unknown, and County of Racine, 620 F.2d 160, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18326 (7th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellee Jill Tinetti brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the defendants-appellants’ practice of strip-searching persons arrested for non-misdemeanor traffic offenses. The searches were conducted upon all such offenders who were detained overnight in the Racine County jail due to an unwillingness or inability to post bond before their initial appearance in court. 1 The searches were conducted despite the absence of any probable cause to believe that the detainees were concealing contraband or weapons on their bodies. The district court ruled that the appellants’ practices violated the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and granted Ti-netti both declaratory and injunctive relief. *161 We affirm the judgment of the district court, which is published at 479 F.Supp. 486 (E.D.Wis.1979), and adopt the district court’s Memorandum and Order as the decision of this court.

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Although the searches were discontinued in response to this lawsuit, the district court ruled that the situation was “capable of repetition yet evading review”. 479 F.Supp. 486, 489 (E.D.Wis. 1979). This ruling was not challenged on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Short
729 F. Supp. 2d 125 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Batchelor v. Fenwick
710 F. Supp. 2d 811 (S.D. Indiana, 2010)
Calvin v. Sheriff of Will County
405 F. Supp. 2d 933 (N.D. Illinois, 2005)
State v. Nieves
861 A.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2004)
James Campbell v. Frank Miller
373 F.3d 834 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
State v. Hampton
60 P.3d 95 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Helton v. United States
191 F. Supp. 2d 179 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Edwards v. State
750 N.E.2d 377 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Sandy Skurstenis v. James Jones
236 F.3d 678 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Thomas
708 N.E.2d 669 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1999)
Konop v. Northwestern School District
26 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D. South Dakota, 1998)
Justice v. City of Peachtree City
961 F.2d 188 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Draper v. Walsh
790 F. Supp. 1553 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1991)
Allen v. Board of Com'rs of County of Wyandotte
773 F. Supp. 1442 (D. Kansas, 1991)
Wright v. State
778 S.W.2d 944 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)
Karen B. Masters v. Bobby G. Crouch
872 F.2d 1248 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil Maloney
879 F.2d 583 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F.2d 160, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jill-tinetti-v-lee-wittke-sheriff-racine-county-jane-doe-a-racine-ca7-1980.