Jhang v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jhang v. Travis

285 A.D.2d 874, 727 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 19, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 285 A.D.2d 874 (Jhang v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jhang v. Travis, 285 A.D.2d 874, 727 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme [875]*875Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 8, 2000 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Atkins v New York State Bd. of Parole, 273 AD2d 656). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Diaz v Travis, 273 AD2d 568, lv denied 95 NY2d 764).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme [875]*875Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 8, 2000 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Atkins v New York State Bd. of Parole, 273 AD2d 656). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Diaz v Travis, 273 AD2d 568, lv denied 95 NY2d 764).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D.2d 874, 727 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jhang-v-travis-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack