Diaz v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Diaz v. Travis

273 A.D.2d 568, 710 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 568 (Diaz v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diaz v. Travis, 273 A.D.2d 568, 710 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered September 10, 1999 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Inasmuch as petitioner, a prison inmate, reappeared before the Board of Parole following the January 1998 parole release hearing that gave rise to this appeal and his request for release was again denied, the instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Keating v New York State Div. of Parole, 252 AD2d 635). Petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715) has been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered September 10, 1999 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Inasmuch as petitioner, a prison inmate, reappeared before the Board of Parole following the January 1998 parole release hearing that gave rise to this appeal and his request for release was again denied, the instant appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Keating v New York State Div. of Parole, 252 AD2d 635). Petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715) has been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 568, 710 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-travis-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack