J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

1987 T.C. Memo. 296, 53 T.C.M. 1125, 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296
United States Tax Court·Decided June 16, 1987·No. Docket No. 6343-82.·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

J.H. RUTTER REX MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 6343-82.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1987-296; 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296; 53 T.C.M. (CCH) 1125; T.C.M. (RIA) 87296;
June 16, 1987; Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded September 7, 1988
Edward B. Benjamin, Jr. and Robert W. Nuzum, for the petitioners.
Linda J. Bourquin,Linda K. West and H. Carl Zeswitz, for the respondent.

SCOTT

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCOTT, Judge: On August 28, 1986, we filed our Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion in the above-entitled case. T.C. Memo. 1986-4071.

Respondent in his Notice of Deficiency determined deficiencies in income tax and*299 accumulated earnings tax of petitioner for the years 1976, 1977 and 1978 as follows:

Deficiency inAccumulated
YearIncome TaxEarnings Tax
1976$367,621
1977199,800$446,658
1978199,8002 598,077

In our Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion filed August 28, 1986, we held that petitioner was liable for the accumulated earnings tax under section 531 3 for the years 1977 and 1978. We sustained petitioner in part and respondent in part with respect to the income tax deficiency for each of the years 1976, 1977 and 1978, and stated that decision would be entered under Rule 155, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

On March 27, 1987, respondent filed his computation for entry of decision*300 in the above-entitled case and on April 17, 1987, petitioner filed its notice of objection to respondent's computation and its computation for entry of decision. The computations of the deficiencies in income tax by each of the parties is the same. The only difference in the computations of the parties with respect to the deficiencies in accumulated earnings tax is that respondent, in computing accumulated earnings tax, for each of the years 1977 and 1978 did not deduct any portion of the deficiencies in income tax which were determined to be due by petitioner in our original opinion, but only the amount of income tax of petitioner for each of these years that was not contested in the petition. Petitioner in his computation deducted the entire income tax due under the opinion of this Court for each of the years 1977 and 1978 as computed in its computation which is the same as computed in respondent's computation for entry of decision under Rule 155.

Section 531 provides for the imposition of accumulated earnings tax on corporations. This tax is imposed on accumulated earnings taxable income as defined in section 535. Section 535 provides that the term accumulated taxable income*301 means the taxable income adjusted as provided in subsection (b) of that section, minus the sum of the dividends paid deduction and the accumulated earnings credit. Among the adjustments to taxable income listed in subsection (b) is:

(1) Taxes. -- There shall be allowed as a deduction Federal income and excess profits taxes and income, war profits, and excess profits taxes of foreign countries and possessions of the United States (to the extent not allowable as a deduction under section 275(a)(4)), accrued during the taxable year or deemed to be paid by a domestic corporation under section 902(a) or 960(a)(1) for the taxable year, but not including the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, the personal holding company tax imposed by section 541, or the taxes imposed by corresponding sections of a prior income tax law. 4

*302 Petitioner in its motion states that its representative discussed with representatives of respondent the adoption of its proposed computation deducting as taxes an amount including the deficiencies for the years 1977 and 1978 determined in the Rule 155 computations of petitioner and respondent. Petitioner in its notice of objection to respondent's computation asked the Court to accept its computation and to wait 10 days thereafter to enter the decision in accordanc

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner, 1987 T.C. Memo. 296, 53 T.C.M. 1125, 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 296 (tax 1987).

1987 T.C. Memo. 296 (J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related