Jewish Press, Inc. v. Willner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jewish Press, Inc. v. Willner

190 A.D.2d 841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 190 A.D.2d 841 (Jewish Press, Inc. v. Willner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewish Press, Inc. v. Willner, 190 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), entered September 7, 1990, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs in the principal sum of $24,274.80.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the plaintiffs’ award to the principal sum of $8,066; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the appellant, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

This appeal involves a contract for the purchase and installation of certain computers. The appellant breached that contract by failing to install a system that adequately met the needs of the respondents. After the breach, and after the parties’ settlement negotiations broke down, the respondents made only one half-hearted attempt to reduce their loss by selling the computer hardware, and ultimately donated the computers to Yeshiva University.

We find that the respondents failed to exert reasonable efforts to mitigate damages (see, Losei Realty Corp. v City of New York, 254 NY 41, 48; Hamilton v McPherson, 28 NY 72, 77). Therefore, the judgment must be reduced by $16,208.80, the market value of the Stride computer hardware at the time of trial. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), entered September 7, 1990, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs in the principal sum of $24,274.80.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the plaintiffs’ award to the principal sum of $8,066; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the appellant, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

This appeal involves a contract for the purchase and installation of certain computers. The appellant breached that contract by failing to install a system that adequately met the needs of the respondents. After the breach, and after the parties’ settlement negotiations broke down, the respondents made only one half-hearted attempt to reduce their loss by selling the computer hardware, and ultimately donated the computers to Yeshiva University.

We find that the respondents failed to exert reasonable efforts to mitigate damages (see, Losei Realty Corp. v City of New York, 254 NY 41, 48; Hamilton v McPherson, 28 NY 72, 77). Therefore, the judgment must be reduced by $16,208.80, the market value of the Stride computer hardware at the time of trial. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewish-press-inc-v-willner-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack