Jewish Board of Guardians v. Grumman Allied Industries Inc.
This text of 465 N.E.2d 42 (Jewish Board of Guardians v. Grumman Allied Industries Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 465), to which we add that, as to the claim against defendant Biuso, plaintiff’s expert’s testimony established no more than that the way the expert would have handled the job would meet the standards of the architectural profession, not that Biuso did not meet such standards. Indeed, as to application of the roof to the modular units at the job site rather than at the factory, the expert conceded that there were many precedents for doing it that way.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 N.E.2d 42, 62 N.Y.2d 684, 476 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewish-board-of-guardians-v-grumman-allied-industries-inc-ny-1984.