Jewell v. Lamoreaux

Michigan Supreme Court

Jewell v. Lamoreaux

30 Mich. 155, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 158

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 30 Mich. 155 (Jewell v. Lamoreaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewell v. Lamoreaux, 30 Mich. 155, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 158 (Mich. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action of replevin brought by Jewell against Lamoreaux in the court below. The property was taken on the writ and delivered to the plaintiff. The defendant moved on affidavits for an order dismissing the writ and quashing all proceedings, on the grounds that the defendant was a deputy sheriff and the writ was directed to the sheriff and served- by another deputy, that the writ was issued without authority of law, and that the service was unlawful and irregular and gave the court no jurisdiction. The affidavit and writ, however, were in the usual form, against the defendant individually, and did not disclose his official capacity. The court below granted the motion, with costs to be taxed, including an attorney’s fee of five dollars.

The decision of the court below was erroneous. The motion raised questions of fact that did not appear on the face of the papers, and that were not properly triable on davits. The questions sought to be determined were such as should have been in some way brought to trial on evidence upon an issue of fact. Whether this could be done •under the general issue, or would be more properly the subject of a plea in abatement, it is unnecessary to determine.

The order granted being a final determination of the suit, with a judgment against the plaintiff for costs, is properly reviewable on writ of error.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action of replevin brought by Jewell against Lamoreaux in the court below. The property was taken on the writ and delivered to the plaintiff. The defendant moved on affidavits for an order dismissing the writ and quashing all proceedings, on the grounds that the defendant was a deputy sheriff and the writ was directed to the sheriff and served- by another deputy, that the writ was issued without authority of law, and that the service was unlawful and irregular and gave the court no jurisdiction. The affidavit and writ, however, were in the usual form, against the defendant individually, and did not disclose his official capacity. The court below granted the motion, with costs to be taxed, including an attorney’s fee of five dollars.

The decision of the court below was erroneous. The motion raised questions of fact that did not appear on the face of the papers, and that were not properly triable on davits. The questions sought to be determined were such as should have been in some way brought to trial on evidence upon an issue of fact. Whether this could be done •under the general issue, or would be more properly the subject of a plea in abatement, it is unnecessary to determine.

The order granted being a final determination of the suit, with a judgment against the plaintiff for costs, is properly reviewable on writ of error.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Mich. 155, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-lamoreaux-mich-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack