Dages v. Sanilac Circuit Judge
This text of 81 N.W. 355 (Dages v. Sanilac Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the circuit judge to vacate an order quashing a writ of replevin with costs. The order was a final one, and reviewable on error. The papers on which the order was based were matters of record. Jewell v. Lamoreaux, 30 Mich. 155; Pingree v. Steere, 68 Mich. 204. The case is unlike People v. Bay Circuit Judge, 41 Mich. 326. In that case the application was to vacate an order [491]*491quashing an attachment. The writ contained the usual summons clause, which defendant was still bound to answer, and the case was not dismissed. The order was not, therefore, final. In the present case the order was final, and reviewable on error. See Olson v. Muskegon Circuit Judge, 49 Mich. 85; Orth v. Montcalm Circuit Judge, McGrath, Mand. Cas. No. 717.
The writ will be denied on this ground.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 N.W. 355, 122 Mich. 490, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dages-v-sanilac-circuit-judge-mich-1899.