Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Jewell v. Director

Jewell v. Director

204 A.2d 564, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 958
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 16, 1964
Docket[App. No. 62, September Term, 1964.]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 A.2d 564 (Jewell v. Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jewell v. Director, 204 A.2d 564, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 958 (Md. 1964).

Opinion

236 Md. 643 (1964)
204 A.2d 564

JEWELL
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 62, September Term, 1964.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 16, 1964.

*644 Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v. Director, 235 Md. 668.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oppel v. Director of Patuxent Institution
205 A.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Hirons v. Director of Patuxent Institution
205 A.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.2d 564, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-director-md-1964.