Hirons v. Director of Patuxent Institution
205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 655, 1964 Md. LEXIS 967
Opinion
In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises only contentions that have been repeatedly found to be without merit in prior decisions of this Court. See, for example, Wheatfall v. Director, 236 Md. 623, and Jewell v. Director, 236 Md. 643. See also Pence v. Director, 235 Md. 651, and Williams v. Director, 232 Md. 632.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hirons v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 205 A.2d 210, 236 Md. 655, 1964 Md. LEXIS 967 (Md. 1964).
205 A.2d 210 (Hirons v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Director
192 A.2d 785 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)
Jewell v. Director
204 A.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Pence v. Director of Patuxent Institution
201 A.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Wheatfall v. Director
203 A.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)