JEWELERS INTERN. SHOWCASE, INC. v. Mandell

529 So. 2d 1211, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1813, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3476, 1988 WL 79328
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1988
Docket88-645
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 529 So. 2d 1211 (JEWELERS INTERN. SHOWCASE, INC. v. Mandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JEWELERS INTERN. SHOWCASE, INC. v. Mandell, 529 So. 2d 1211, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1813, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3476, 1988 WL 79328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

529 So.2d 1211 (1988)

JEWELERS INTERNATIONAL SHOWCASE, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Saul MANDELL, Respondent.

No. 88-645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 2, 1988.
Rehearing Denied September 6, 1988.

*1212 Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Michael Josephs and Denise V. Powers, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Stanley J. Bartel, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed in part for being overbroad, and the subject order is accordingly modified to require the petitioner to produce for the respondent's inspection the following corporate records pursuant to Section 607.157(4), Florida Statutes (1987), to wit: a copy of the corporate income tax returns, the general ledger of the corporation, the balance sheets of the corporation, the profit and loss statements of the corporation, and the corporate stockbook — as opposed to "all of [the corporation's] financial books and records" which are ordered produced by the order under review. Where, as here, a corporate stockholder's primary purpose in inspecting the corporation's books and records under the above statute is to determine the value of the stock owned by the stockholder, it has been held that, generally speaking, the above-stated business records are the sole relevant corporate records which the corporation must produce for inspection. Sage v. State ex rel. Perrone, 313 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). No showing has been made in this case that additional records are needed to determine the value of respondent's corporate stock. See News-Journal Corp. v. State ex rel. Gore, 136 Fla. 620, 624, 187 So. 271, 272 (1939).

Certiorari granted; order under review modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darr v. Marine Electronics Solutions, Inc.
96 So. 3d 527 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
D. Stephenson Construction, Inc. v. Mendiguren
958 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Collier Anesthesia, PA v. Worden
726 So. 2d 342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Computer Solutions, Inc. v. Gnaizda
633 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Southfork Investments Group, Inc. v. Williams
613 So. 2d 940 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
URT Industries, Inc. v. Scorpio Music, Inc.
567 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 1211, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1813, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3476, 1988 WL 79328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewelers-intern-showcase-inc-v-mandell-fladistctapp-1988.