Jeter v. McFadden

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2006·No. 05-7388·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7388

ERIC DAVID JETER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCFADDEN, Investigator; JUDGE WHITE, Magistrate, Florence, South Carolina; FLORENCE COUNTY SHERIFFS’ DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-1703-GRA)

Submitted: December 16, 2005 Decided: January 20, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric David Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eric David Jeter appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Jeter v. McFadden, No. CA-05-1703-GRA (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeter v. McFadden, (4th Cir. 2006).

Jeter v. McFadden (Jeter v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related