Jeter v. McFadden
This text of Jeter v. McFadden (Jeter v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7388
ERIC DAVID JETER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS MCFADDEN, Investigator; JUDGE WHITE, Magistrate, Florence, South Carolina; FLORENCE COUNTY SHERIFFS’ DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-1703-GRA)
Submitted: December 16, 2005 Decided: January 20, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric David Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eric David Jeter appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Jeter v. McFadden, No. CA-05-1703-GRA (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeter v. McFadden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeter-v-mcfadden-ca4-2006.