Jesus Sanches Herrera v. United States

280 F.2d 888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 6, 1960
Docket16463
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 F.2d 888 (Jesus Sanches Herrera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesus Sanches Herrera v. United States, 280 F.2d 888 (9th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (Jesus Sanches Herrera, also known as Jesse Herrera) and Wong Shew Moo, also known as Tommy Wong, were indicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division. The indictment was in three counts. Counts 1 and 2 charged violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 by appellant and Wong Shew Moo. *889 Count 3 charged a violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 by appellant.

Appellant was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, had a jury trial and was found guilty on each count of the indictment. A judgment of conviction was entered, sentencing appellant to be imprisoned five years on each count, the sentences on counts 1 and 2 to run consecutively, the sentences on counts 1 and 3 to run concurrently. This appeal is from that judgment.

Appellant’s brief does not, as required by our Rule 18, 28 U.S.C.A., contain a specification of errors relied upon. Hence this appeal presents nothing for review. 1 Though not required to do so, 2 we have searched the record for error and have found none.

Judgment aflirmed.

1

. Lemke v. United States, 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 73, 14 Alaska 587; Pinkston v. United States, 9 Cir., 278 F.2d 833.

2

. See cases cited in footnote 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-sanches-herrera-v-united-states-ca9-1960.