Jesse Torres v. Edward Garcia, Mel J. Cozzalio and Melvin H. Nicolai

444 F.2d 537
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1971·No. 26848·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jesse Torres, an inmate of the California prison at Folsom, tendered in the district court a complaint for $1,000,000 damages from three named defendants, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S. C. § 1983. At the same time he moved in the district court to proceed with the action in forma pauperis.

The district court permitted the complaint to be filed, but denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), on the ground that the action is frivolous and malicious. Torres appeals.

The district court has wide discretion in acting upon motions to proceed in forma pauperis as a plaintiff in civil litigation, especially in civil rights actions brought by prisoners. In this case we are not convinced that the court has abused its discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jesse Torres v. Edward Garcia, Mel J. Cozzalio and Melvin H. Nicolai, 444 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1971).

444 F.2d 537 (Jesse Torres v. Edward Garcia, Mel J. Cozzalio and Melvin H. Nicolai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related