Jersey Insurance Co. of New York v. Cuttriss

220 So. 2d 15, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5991
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1969·No. Nos. 68-625—68-627·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question on this appeal is whether a compensation carrier has the exclusive right, in the second year after the accrual of a cause of action, to institute an action against a third party tort feasor pursuant to § 440.39, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

We reject this argument and hold that in the second year the injured employee and the carrier have concurrent rights against a third party tort feasor. But, the right to proceed against the tort feasor is limited to the one who files his cause of action first. Home Indemnity Company v. McAdams, Fla. App. 1962, 139 So.2d 433; Zurich Insurance Company v. Renton, Fla. App. 1966, 189 So.2d 492.

Therefore, we find no error in the trial court’s orders here under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jersey Insurance Co. of New York v. Cuttriss, 220 So. 2d 15, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5991 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

220 So. 2d 15 (Jersey Insurance Co. of New York v. Cuttriss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimbrell v. Paige
448 So. 2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Kimbrell v. Paige
422 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Maryland Casualty Company v. Smith
272 So. 2d 517 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz
271 So. 2d 108 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
National Emblem Insurance Co. v. Gillingham
241 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)