Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States

397 F.2d 811, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5966

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 25, 1968·No. 24017·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied a motion to vacate a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea of guilty. A panel of this Court, with one Judge dissenting, affirmed, 385 F.2d 887 (1967). On motion of a Judge of this Court in regular active service the appeal was ordered considered en banc.

Upon such consideration, for the reasons stated in the published opinion of the majority of the panel, the Judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Judges WISDOM, THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG, GODBOLD and SIMPSON dissent for the reasons set out in Judge GOLDBERG’S, dissenting opinion, 385 F.2d 887 at 894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied a motion to vacate a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea of guilty. A panel of this Court, with one Judge dissenting, affirmed, 385 F.2d 887 (1967). On motion of a Judge of this Court in regular active service the appeal was ordered considered en banc.

Upon such consideration, for the reasons stated in the published opinion of the majority of the panel, the Judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Judges WISDOM, THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG, GODBOLD and SIMPSON dissent for the reasons set out in Judge GOLDBERG’S, dissenting opinion, 385 F.2d 887 at 894.

Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States, 397 F.2d 811, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5966 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

397 F.2d 811 (Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related