Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States
This text of 397 F.2d 811 (Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The District Court denied a motion to vacate a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea of guilty. A panel of this Court, with one Judge dissenting, affirmed, 385 F.2d 887 (1967). On motion of a Judge of this Court in regular active service the appeal was ordered considered en banc.
Upon such consideration, for the reasons stated in the published opinion of the majority of the panel, the Judgment of the District Court is
Affirmed.
Judges WISDOM, THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG, GODBOLD and SIMPSON dissent for the reasons set out in Judge GOLDBERG’S, dissenting opinion, 385 F.2d 887 at 894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 F.2d 811, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-mack-dorrough-v-united-states-ca5-1968.