Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States

440 F.2d 1336, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10604

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1971

Docket30478

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 440 F.2d 1336 (Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States, 440 F.2d 1336, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10604 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Jerry Mack Dorrough, a Fifth Circuit veteran, seeks once more to escape the finality of his much parsed conviction for robbing and placing in jeopardy the life of a federal postal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2114. 1 We have again scrutinized Dorrough’s plea of guilty, and we find all his claims of imperfection without merit in light of our prior decisions. See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887, aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. This case represents the fourth time Dorrough has challenged his guilty plea under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887, aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811, cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 1019, 89 S.Ct. 1637, 23 L.Ed.2d 44. See also Dorrough v. State of Texas, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1063.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Jerry Mack Dorrough, a Fifth Circuit veteran, seeks once more to escape the finality of his much parsed conviction for robbing and placing in jeopardy the life of a federal postal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2114. 1 We have again scrutinized Dorrough’s plea of guilty, and we find all his claims of imperfection without merit in light of our prior decisions. See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887, aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. This case represents the fourth time Dorrough has challenged his guilty plea under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887, aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811, cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 1019, 89 S.Ct. 1637, 23 L.Ed.2d 44. See also Dorrough v. State of Texas, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1063.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

440 F.2d 1336, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-mack-dorrough-v-united-states-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack