Jerry Hawkins v. Lt. Steven Glover

582 F. App'x 663
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 30, 2014
Docket13-3262
StatusUnpublished

This text of 582 F. App'x 663 (Jerry Hawkins v. Lt. Steven Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerry Hawkins v. Lt. Steven Glover, 582 F. App'x 663 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inmate Jerry Hawkins appeals the order the district court 1 entered following an evidentiary hearing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action; nominal damages were awarded against one defendant and the claims against the remaining defendants were dismissed. The evidentiary hearing amounted to a bench trial-at which the court could determine witness credibility, and decide disputed facts-because Hawkins did not timely request a jury trial. See Hartsfield v. Colburn, 491 F.3d 394, 395-96 (8th Cir. 2007); Darst-Webbe Tenant Ass’n Bd. v. St. Louis Rous. Auth., 339 F.3d 702, 710-11 (8th Cir.2003) (in appeal from civil bench trial, this court reviews trial court’s findings of fact for clear error and conclusions of law de novo). We find no basis, and Hawkins offers none, 2 for reversing the district court’s disposition of his claims. See Scott v. Benson, 742 F.3d 335, 339-40 (8th Cir.2014) (discussing deliberate-indifference standard, which requires mental state akin to criminal recklessness; mere difference of opinion over course of treatment or matters of expert medical judgment does not amount to constitutional violation); see also Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 543 (8th Cir.2014) (supervisory liability under § 1983). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

2

. We do not address the new matters Hawkins raises in his opening and reply briefs, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004); or those he has waived, see Jenkins v. Winter, 540 F.3d 742, 751 (8th Cir.2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Napoleon Hartsfield v. Nurse Janice Colburn
491 F.3d 394 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Jenkins v. Winter
540 F.3d 742 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Daniel Scott v. Mary Benson
742 F.3d 335 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Randall Jackson v. Jay Nixon
747 F.3d 537 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 F. App'x 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerry-hawkins-v-lt-steven-glover-ca8-2014.