Jerez v. 2141, LLC

2021 NY Slip Op 00525
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2021
DocketIndex No. 25959/18 Appeal No. 13022N Case No. 2020-01605
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00525 (Jerez v. 2141, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerez v. 2141, LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op 00525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Jerez v 2141, LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 00525)
Jerez v 2141, LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 00525
Decided on February 02, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 02, 2021
Before: Renwick, J.P., Webber, González, Scarpulla, JJ.

Index No. 25959/18 Appeal No. 13022N Case No. 2020-01605

[*1]Griselda Diaz Jerez, Plaintiff- Respondent,

v

2141, LLC, Defendant- Appellant.


Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla (Rebecca A. Barrett of counsel), for appellant.

Anthony J. Cugini, Riverdale, for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered February 5, 2020, which denied defendant's motion to compel certain discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to compel discovery on the ground that defendant failed to demonstrate that information relating to plaintiff's 2010 work-related back injury was relevant to her present shoulder and knee injury claims (see Lafata v Verizon Communications Inc., 180 AD3d 575 [1st Dept 2020]; Gumbs v Flushing Town Ctr. III, L.P., 114 AD3d 573 [1st Dept 2014], appeal withdrawn 25 NY3d 986 [2015]). Plaintiff testified that any difficulty that she had had walking due to the 2010 injury was mild, intermittent, and a result of pain rather than physiological causes, and that it had been resolved by surgery

performed years before the accident from which the present claims arise (see Brito v Gomez, 33 NY3d 1126 [2019]; Bennett v Gordon, 99 AD3d 539 [1st Dept 2012]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 2, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerez v. 2141, LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 00525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerez-v-2141-llc-nyappdiv-2021.