Jerald v. Valentino

9 R.I. Dec. 4

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 25, 1932·No. No. 83784·Published

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,066.70 in an action for negligence.

Lewis E. Jerald, husband of Blanche R. Jerald, brought suit for consequential damages. The matter of liability has been decided in the case of May S. Smyth vs. Vito Valentino, No. 83782.

No question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,066.70 in an action for negligence.

Lewis E. Jerald, husband of Blanche R. Jerald, brought suit for consequential damages. The matter of liability has been decided in the case of May S. Smyth vs. Vito Valentino, No. 83782.

No question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Jerald v. Valentino, 9 R.I. Dec. 4 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

9 R.I. Dec. 4 (Jerald v. Valentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.