Jerald v. Valentino

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Jerald v. Valentino

9 R.I. Dec. 3

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 25, 1932

DocketNo. 83783

StatusPublished

This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 3 (Jerald v. Valentino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jerald v. Valentino, 9 R.I. Dec. 3 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for a new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000 in an action for negligence.

This case was tried at the same time as the case of May S. Smyth v. Vito Valentino, No. 83782. Blanche R. Jerald, the plaintiff, was riding in the same car involved in the accident and the matter of liability depends upon the same points.

No , question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for a new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000 in an action for negligence.

This case was tried at the same time as the case of May S. Smyth v. Vito Valentino, No. 83782. Blanche R. Jerald, the plaintiff, was riding in the same car involved in the accident and the matter of liability depends upon the same points.

No , question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 R.I. Dec. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerald-v-valentino-risuperct-1932.