Jerald v. Valentino

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Jerald v. Valentino

9 R.I. Dec. 3

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 25, 1932·No. No. 83783·Published

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for a new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000 in an action for negligence.

This case was tried at the same time as the case of May S. Smyth v. Vito Valentino, No. 83782. Blanche R. Jerald, the plaintiff, was riding in the same car involved in the accident and the matter of liability depends upon the same points.

No , question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCHILL, J.

Motion for a new trial filed by the defendant after a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000 in an action for negligence.

This case was tried at the same time as the case of May S. Smyth v. Vito Valentino, No. 83782. Blanche R. Jerald, the plaintiff, was riding in the same car involved in the accident and the matter of liability depends upon the same points.

No , question is raised in regard to the amount of the verdict. On the evidence it was amply justified.

Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Jerald v. Valentino, 9 R.I. Dec. 3 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

9 R.I. Dec. 3 (Jerald v. Valentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.