Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

7 A.2d 96, 136 Pa. Super. 16, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 173

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1939·No. Appeal, 44·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

For the reasons so clearly stated by Judge Caee, of the court below, in his dissenting opinion, which will be found in the reporter’s statement, we are of opinion that the judgment on the award in favor of the claimant must be reversed and judgment entered for the defendant. 1

It is so ordered.

1

See also Elder v. Penna. R. R. Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, 148, 180 A. 183; Martini v. Director General, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, 534; Phila. & R. Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 U. S. 327, 329; Bauchspies v. Central R. of N. J., 287 Pa. 590, 135 A. 728; Glunt v. Penna. R. R. Co., 249 Pa. 522, 95 A. 109.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

For the reasons so clearly stated by Judge Caee, of the court below, in his dissenting opinion, which will be found in the reporter’s statement, we are of opinion that the judgment on the award in favor of the claimant must be reversed and judgment entered for the defendant. 1

It is so ordered.

1

See also Elder v. Penna. R. R. Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, 148, 180 A. 183; Martini v. Director General, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, 534; Phila. & R. Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 U. S. 327, 329; Bauchspies v. Central R. of N. J., 287 Pa. 590, 135 A. 728; Glunt v. Penna. R. R. Co., 249 Pa. 522, 95 A. 109.

Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad, 7 A.2d 96, 136 Pa. Super. 16, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 173 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

7 A.2d 96 (Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related