Jenkins v. State

585 P.2d 442, 1978 Utah LEXIS 1427
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 1978
Docket16034
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 585 P.2d 442 (Jenkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. State, 585 P.2d 442, 1978 Utah LEXIS 1427 (Utah 1978).

Opinions

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, who appeared pro se in the trial court.

The court held:
1. It had jurisdiction.
2. Plaintiff had standing.
3. The Forty Second, 1977-78 Utah Legislature was already seated, and is a de facto legislature.
4. All laws enacted by the 1977-78 legislature are valid, and monies collected by that body need not be returned to the people.
5.Administrators and teachers employed by Utah Public School System hold a public office of profit or trust, and thus may not be members of the Utah Legislature; because such would" be in violation of Art. VI, Sec. 6, Constitution of Utah.

We affirm the holdings of the trial court in 1 and 2. As to 3 and 4, we hold the Forty Second Legislature to be, at least, a de facto Legislature. Thus, laws enacted by it are not invalid by reason of its membership. As to Number 5, we do not reach that issue, and the District Court should not have reached it, because proper parties defendant are not before the court. For that reason we reverse the District Court as to Number 5: Because proper parties defendant are not before the court, a decision disposing of Number 5 would be advisory only. Rendering advisory opinions is not a function of this Court.

An inherent role of the judiciary, in matters of this nature, is interpretation of Constitutional provisions. Thus, jurisdiction is properly lodged.1

Appellants cite the usual rule that one must be personally adversely affected before he has standing to prosecute an action.2 While such is true, it is also true this Court may grant standing where matters of great public interest and societal impact are concerned.3

ELLETT, C. J., and HALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laws v. Grayeyes
2021 UT 59 (Utah Supreme Court, 2021)
People v. Superior Court (Ahn)
California Court of Appeal, 2018
People ex rel. Becerra v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 250 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Lisa Howe v. Bill Haslam
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2014
Gregory v. Shurtleff
2013 UT 18 (Utah Supreme Court, 2013)
Ohio Roundtable v. Taft
2002 Ohio 3669 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division, 2002)
City of Chattanooga v. Davis
54 S.W.3d 248 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2001)
City of Chattanooga v. Kevin Davis
Tennessee Supreme Court, 2001
State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward
1999 Ohio 123 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
NAT. PARKS & CONS. ASS'N v. Bd. of St. Lands
869 P.2d 909 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)
Matter of Estate of Hunt
842 P.2d 872 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
Terracor v. Utah Board of State Lands & Forestry
716 P.2d 796 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
Jenkins v. Swan
675 P.2d 1145 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)
Stromquist v. Cokayne
646 P.2d 746 (Utah Supreme Court, 1982)
Redwood Gym v. Salt Lake County Commission
624 P.2d 1138 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)
State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
1980 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1980)
Jenkins v. Finlinson
607 P.2d 289 (Utah Supreme Court, 1980)
Jenkins v. State
585 P.2d 442 (Utah Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 P.2d 442, 1978 Utah LEXIS 1427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-state-utah-1978.