Jenkins v. State

791 So. 2d 1119, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15952, 2000 WL 1781417
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 2000·No. No. 4D99-1557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence for the sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a house of worship. There was testimony at trial that the sale occurred within 158 feet, or less, of the Salem Haitian Lutheran Church, and that religious [1120]*1120services are regularly conducted at the church. As in Jean v. State, 764 So.2d 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), Appellant’s conduct fell within that proscribed by the plain meaning of section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes; hence, he may not “successfully challenge the statute for vagueness nor complain of its vagueness as applied to the hypothetical conduct of others.” Id. at 607; see also Rice v. State, 754 So.2d 881 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Appellant’s argument that the statute’s lack of definition of the term “physical place for worship” makes it susceptible of arbitrary enforcement is simply an additional challenge based on vagueness. We also affirm as to the evidentiary issue raised, as it was not preserved.

GUNTHER, STONE, and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. State, 791 So. 2d 1119, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15952, 2000 WL 1781417 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

791 So. 2d 1119 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McHolder v. State
917 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)