Jenkins v. State
737 So. 2d 625, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9906, 1999 WL 516340
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jenkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 685 So. 2d 918 →
Opinion
Because appellant’s motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), is legally sufficient, we reverse and remand the order denying the motion [626]*626with directions that the trial court address the merits of appellant’s claim. See Stoutamire v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1180, 734 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jenkins v. State, 737 So. 2d 625, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9906, 1999 WL 516340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
737 So. 2d 625 (Jenkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stoutamire v. State
734 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)