Jenkins v. Public Service Co.
524 S.E.2d 805, 351 N.C. 341, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 127
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Wynn, J. Further, we conclude the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jenkins v. Public Service Co., 524 S.E.2d 805, 351 N.C. 341, 2000 N.C. LEXIS 127 (N.C. 2000).
524 S.E.2d 805 (Jenkins v. Public Service Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
798 S.E.2d 143 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Yingling v. Bank of America
741 S.E.2d 395 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Hutchens v. Lee
729 S.E.2d 111 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
Raper v. Mansfield Systems, Inc.
657 S.E.2d 899 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Shepherd v. NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESSES
654 S.E.2d 831 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Burchette v. East Coast Millwork Distributors, Inc.
562 S.E.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)