Jenkins v. Lilley

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 12, 2025
Docket1:23-cv-09613
StatusUnknown

This text of Jenkins v. Lilley (Jenkins v. Lilley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins v. Lilley, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 6/12/2025 ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : TERRELL JENKINS, : : Petitioner, : 1:23-cv-9613-GHW : -v- : ORDER : SUPERINTENDENT LYNN LILLEY, : Superintendent, Eastern NY Correctional Facility, : : Respondent. : : ------------------------------------------------------------------ X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On May 19, 2025, Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger issued a report and recommendation in this case. Dkt. No. 33 (the “R&R”). A plaintiff is ordinarily afforded fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the R&R in this case stated: “Any party shall have fourteen (14) days to file a written response to the other party’s objections . . . . Failure to file timely objections will result in a waiver of the right to object and will preclude appellate review.” R&R at 29–30. The deadline for Mr. Jenkins to object to the R&R was June 2, 2025. On June 1, 2025, Mr. Jenkins requested a fourteen-day extension of time to file written objections to the R&R. Dkt. No. 34. The Court received the request on June 10, 2025. Id. “It is well established that a court is ordinarily obligated to afford a special solicitude to pro se litigants.” Tracy v. Freshwater, 623 F.3d 90, 101 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the deadline for Mr. Jenkins to file written objections to the R&R is extended to June 16, 2025. Respondent has fourteen days to file a written response to any objections filed by Mr. Jenkins. As detailed in the R&R, any such objections and responses shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with courtesy copies delivered to the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, and to the Chambers of the undersigned, at United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file tmely objections will result in a waiver of the right to object and will preclude appellate review. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Mr. Jenkins by certified mail. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 12, 2025 New York, New York J. Ne Doves f Host H. WOODS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Tracy v. Freshwater
623 F.3d 90 (Second Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jenkins v. Lilley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-lilley-nysd-2025.