Jenkins v. Jenkins

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Jenkins v. Jenkins

431 So. 2d 1287, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1236

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 27, 1983

DocketCiv. 3170

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 431 So. 2d 1287 (Jenkins v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenkins v. Jenkins, 431 So. 2d 1287, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1236 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

The record filed in this court is so incomplete as to be virtually nonexistent. In no legal sense could any of the appellant’s papers herein filed be deemed to be a brief, for they are unintelligible, state no issue which is founded upon any trial record or transcript, cite no authority and do not remotely comply with any of the rules of procedure which govern appeals in this court. Therefore, the judgment herein is affirmed. Bland v. Hunter, 418 So.2d 884 (Ala.1982); Welch v. Turner, 411 So.2d 143 (Ala.Civ.App.1982); Davis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 335 So.2d 688 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 335 So.2d 691 (Ala.1976).

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge 'EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of section 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and [1288]*1288this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

The record filed in this court is so incomplete as to be virtually nonexistent. In no legal sense could any of the appellant’s papers herein filed be deemed to be a brief, for they are unintelligible, state no issue which is founded upon any trial record or transcript, cite no authority and do not remotely comply with any of the rules of procedure which govern appeals in this court. Therefore, the judgment herein is affirmed. Bland v. Hunter, 418 So.2d 884 (Ala.1982); Welch v. Turner, 411 So.2d 143 (Ala.Civ.App.1982); Davis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 335 So.2d 688 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 335 So.2d 691 (Ala.1976).

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge 'EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of section 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and [1288]*1288this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 So. 2d 1287, 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-jenkins-alacivapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack