Bland v. Hunter
This text of 418 So. 2d 884 (Bland v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal, pro se, by Chester Bland, complains of the entry of certain judgments by the trial court in two cases consolidated for trial below.
Appellee, Virgil Hunter, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and a brief in support thereof. The motion to dismiss is well taken and is hereby granted. This appeal is dismissed for failure to comply in any respect with the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding form and content of the alleged brief in support of the appeal. It is unintelligible to the extent that this court cannot discern what errors are being urged by appellant.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 So. 2d 884, 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bland-v-hunter-ala-1982.