Jenkins v. Capra

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 11, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-08274·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAEMONIENKINS. SSS

Petitioner, 23 CIVIL 8274 (PAE)(RWL) -against- JUDGMENT MICHAEL CAPRA, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Respondent. wenn K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 11, 2024, the Court has adopted the Report's recommendation to dismiss the petition for habeas corpus. Jenkins's failure to file timely written objections, as noted in the Report, precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cnty., 517 F.3d 601,604 (2d Cir. 2008); Small v. Sec'y a/Health & Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). The Court has therefore declined to issue a certificate of appealability and certifies that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose ofan appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,445 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York December 11, 2024 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: HK MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. Capra, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Jenkins v. Capra (Jenkins v. Capra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Caidor v. Onondaga County
517 F.3d 601 (Second Circuit, 2008)