Jedlicki v. Dwelling Managers, Inc.
9 Misc. 2d 292, 164 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2969
Opinion
Counsel’s explanation that the delay of almost six years in prosecuting the action was due to an inadvertence in filing, does not satisfy the requirements of reasonableness called for by section 181 of the Civil Practice Act, and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Moshman v. City of New York, 3 AD 2d 825).
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion dismissing the complaint granted.
Hofstadter, Steuer. and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jedlicki v. Dwelling Managers, Inc., 9 Misc. 2d 292, 164 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
9 Misc. 2d 292 (Jedlicki v. Dwelling Managers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moshman v. City of New York
3 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)