Moshman v. City of New York

3 A.D.2d 822, 160 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6843
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1957·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified so as to dismiss the complaint unconditionally for lack of prosecution and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and dis[823]*823bursements to the appellant, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Counsel’s explanation of the two and one-half years’ delay in bringing the case on for trial, due to moving his office and misplacing the file, does not satisfy the requirements of reasonableness called for by section 181 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 156 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Further, plaintiffs fail to present facts indicating a meritorious cause of action. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ. [See post, pp. 824, 825.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moshman v. City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 822, 160 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

3 A.D.2d 822 (Moshman v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Midolo v. Horner
131 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Ellis v. Urs
121 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Keith v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System
56 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)