Jeanty v. UPS United Parcel Service Freight

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 10, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-08311·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KERVIN JEANTY, Plaintiff, 21-CV-8311 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE FREIGHT; ALAN BEDARD; JOHN DOE, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 1, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeanty v. UPS United Parcel Service Freight, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Jeanty v. UPS United Parcel Service Freight (Jeanty v. UPS United Parcel Service Freight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)