Jeanty v. United Parcel Service

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 14, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-08312·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KERVIN JEANTY, Plaintiff, 21-CV-8312 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED PARCEL SERVICE; CAROL B. TOME; JOHN DOE (1), Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 5, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 14, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeanty v. United Parcel Service, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Jeanty v. United Parcel Service (Jeanty v. United Parcel Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)