Jean Cobb Krum v. Richard D. Sheppard and Gordon P. Hurley, Jointly and Severally

407 F.2d 490, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1967
Docket17389_1
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 407 F.2d 490 (Jean Cobb Krum v. Richard D. Sheppard and Gordon P. Hurley, Jointly and Severally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jean Cobb Krum v. Richard D. Sheppard and Gordon P. Hurley, Jointly and Severally, 407 F.2d 490, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633 (6th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

ORDER

The occurrence out of which this and its predecessor criminal and civil actions arose appear in detail in People v. Krum, 374 Mich. 356, 132 N.W.2d 69 (1965) and are summarized in the opinion of the District Court from which this appeal was perfected (Krum v. Sheppard, 255 F.Supp. 994 (1966)). Therefore suffice it to here only state that following an altercation with Michigan state police officers (the defendants-appellees), plaintiff-appellant was charged, tried and convicted of interfering with an officer in the performance of his duties. That conviction was sustained in People v. Krum, supra. Plaintiff-appellant thereafter brought action against these defendants in the Circuit Court for the County of Mackinac, Michigan, for damages for false arrest, illegal search and malicious prosecution. No appeal was taken from the order dismissing that action.

Subsequently the present action was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division. Although alleging the same occurrence alleged in the civil action in the state Circuit Court, the District Court action was bottomed upon appellant’s deprivation of civil rights by appellees in violation of 42, U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Appeal to this court followed dismissal by the District Court.

District Judge Noel P. Fox sustained a motion of the defendants to dismiss on the ground that the Michigan Statute of Limitations is a bar to this action. We are in accord with this conclusion, and it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Fox’s opinion (Krum v. Sheppard, supra).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. Healy
E.D. Michigan, 2019
Mudge v. MacOmb County
580 N.W.2d 845 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1998)
Gaborik v. Rosema
599 F. Supp. 1476 (W.D. Michigan, 1984)
Leithauser v. City of Madison Heights
577 F. Supp. 994 (E.D. Michigan, 1984)
Covington v. Winger
562 F. Supp. 115 (W.D. Michigan, 1983)
Bergman v. United States
551 F. Supp. 407 (W.D. Michigan, 1982)
Kurzawa v. Mueller
545 F. Supp. 1254 (E.D. Michigan, 1982)
Abshier v. Tichvon
500 F. Supp. 444 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
Elmore v. Evans
449 F. Supp. 2 (E.D. Tennessee, 1976)
Gordon v. City of Warren
415 F. Supp. 556 (E.D. Michigan, 1976)
Marlowe v. Fisher Body
489 F.2d 1057 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
Martinez v. Hernandez
330 F. Supp. 856 (D. Puerto Rico, 1971)
United States ex rel. Sabella v. Newsday
315 F. Supp. 333 (E.D. New York, 1970)
Madison v. Wood
410 F.2d 564 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F.2d 490, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jean-cobb-krum-v-richard-d-sheppard-and-gordon-p-hurley-jointly-and-ca6-1967.