JD v. State
This text of 732 So. 2d 1135 (JD v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J.D., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Frank D.L. Winstead, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
J.D. appeals his juvenile delinquency adjudication for possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana. We affirm the adjudication, but reverse the disposition order.
The trial court erred in imposing community control for an indeterminate period for the offense of possession of marijuana. On remand, the term must be limited to one year, the maximum adult sentence for that offense. See C.P. v. State, 674 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The court also erred in entering a single disposition order for the multiple adjudications. See D.A.D. v. State, 697 So.2d 234 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
Accordingly, we reverse the disposition order entered and remand to the trial court with directions to enter new disposition orders consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and GREEN, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
732 So. 2d 1135, 1999 WL 128657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jd-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.