Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.

698 So. 2d 940, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10569, 1997 WL 577589
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1997·No. 97-1864·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

698 So.2d 940 (1997)

Mildred JAYE, Petitioner,
v.
ROYAL SAXON, INC., Respondent.

No. 97-1864.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 17, 1997.

Edward A. Marod of Edward A. Marod, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

*941 No response required for respondent.

Prior report: Fla.App., 687 So.2d 978.

PER CURIAM.

We summarily dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the challenged order striking Petitioner's demand for jury trial. See Bared & Co., Inc. v. McGuire, 670 So.2d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We also certify conflict with Johnson Engineering, Inc. v. Pate, 563 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Quality Coffee Service, Inc. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 474 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

STONE, C.J., and PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 698 So. 2d 940, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10569, 1997 WL 577589 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

698 So. 2d 940 (Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.
720 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Decker v. State
718 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)