Decker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decker v. State

704 So. 2d 740, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 335, 1998 WL 17477

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1998

DocketNo. 96-03326

StatusPublished

This text of 704 So. 2d 740 (Decker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decker v. State, 704 So. 2d 740, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 335, 1998 WL 17477 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

DANAHY, Judge.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation and the sentence subsequently imposed. However, we remand the case to the trial court for entry of a written order listing the specific conditions of probation the appellant was found to have violated. See Coley v. State, 479 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed, but remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANAHY, Judge.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation and the sentence subsequently imposed. However, we remand the case to the trial court for entry of a written order listing the specific conditions of probation the appellant was found to have violated. See Coley v. State, 479 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed, but remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 So. 2d 740, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 335, 1998 WL 17477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decker-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack