Jay Gee Commerce, Inc. v. Havas

508 P.2d 1015, 89 Nev. 157, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 454
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1973·No. No. 7039·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this unlawful detainer action the issue is whether the lessee effectively exercised its option to renew a lease. The lease required the lessee to give written notice of renewal within 60 to 90 days prior to the lease termination date. The lessee contends that the option was exercised by writing the words “call me about the lease” on a telephone pad at the lessor’s office.

Although the written exercise of a lease renewal option need not be a formal document, Marjer v. Layfmen, 53 A.2d 187 (NJ. Eq. 1947), the writing must contain a concise statement of definite and unequivocal intent to exercise the renewal option according to the terms of the lease. Robert v. E. C. Milstead Ranching Inc., 469 S.W.2d 429 (Tex.Civ.App. 1971); Jones v. Dexter, 292 P.2d 369 (Wash. 1956); United States v. 70.39 Acres of Land, 164 F.Supp. 451 (D.C.S.D. Calif. 1958). The phrase “call me about the lease” is not such a statement.

The judgment below is reversed and the district court is directed to enter judgment restoring the leased premises to the lessor. Other issues are to be tried anew unless that court is satisfied that a proper determination can be made on the record before it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jay Gee Commerce, Inc. v. Havas, 508 P.2d 1015, 89 Nev. 157, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 454 (Neb. 1973).

508 P.2d 1015 (Jay Gee Commerce, Inc. v. Havas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
59 V.I. 148 (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands, 2013)
Jones v. Landmark Leasing, Ltd.
957 S.W.2d 369 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)