Javier v. Russo

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 10, 2022·No. 7:21-cv-07097·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT bles SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 es Ge □□ wane eee eee eee eee X PSS tae AL JAVIER, □□□ per Plaintiff, □□ | oh □

ANTHONY RUSSO, SERGEANT or SERVICE ROSINSKY, C.O. WATKINS, C.O. —_————r MORRISSEY, M. KOPP, Deputy : Superintendent of Programs, ANTHONY 21 CV 7097 (VB) ANNUCCI, Acting NYS DOCCS Commissioner, and A. RODRIGUEZ, Acting Disciplinary Director in Albany, : Defendant. : me ee i a a td mK Briccetti, J.: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his constitutional rights. On December 2, 2021, plaintiff filed the amended complaint. (Doc. #1). On February 2, 2022, the Court entered an Order of Service ordering the U.S. Marshals Service to effectuate service on the defendants named in the amended complaint. (Doc. #14). On May 13, 2022, the Court ordered the Office of the New York State Attorney General (“NYAG’) to ascertain new, updated addresses where certain of the defendants may be served. (Doc. #24). By letters dated June 6 and June 7, 2022, the NYAG has now provided new addresses for defendants Anthony Russo, Anthony Annucci, Anthony Rodriguez, and James Morrissey. (Docs. ##25, 28). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to fill out U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms for the defendants listed in the Appendix to this Order. The Clerk is further instructed to issue summonses listing the defendants and deliver

to the Marshals Service all paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the defendants. The service addresses for the defendants are appended to this Order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff also must notify the Court in writing if plaintiffs address changes, and the Court

may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: June 9, 2022 White Plains, New York SO ORDERED: aul Vr Vincent L.Briccetti United States District Judge

APPENDIX

1. Anthony Russo New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision Office of Counsel The Harriman State Campus, Building 4 1220 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12226 2. Anthony Annucci New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision Office of Counsel The Harriman State Campus, Building 4 1220 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12226 3. Anthony Rodriguez New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision Office of Counsel The Harriman State Campus, Building 4 1220 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12226 4. Correction Officer James Morrissey Mid-State Correctional Facility 9005 Old River Road Marcy, NY 13403

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Javier v. Russo, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Javier v. Russo (Javier v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)