Jaszay v. HB CORPORATION
This text of 598 So. 2d 112 (Jaszay v. HB CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barbara JASZAY, as personal representative of the Estate of Borbala Batu, Appellant,
v.
H.B. CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Broward Convalescent Center, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*113 Jean Anne Kneale and Robert S. Glazier of Hicks, Anderson & Blum, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Linda R. Spaulding of Conrad, Scherer & James, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a final summary judgment which dismissed her complaint holding that the statute of limitations barred the action. We reverse. The appellee is estopped from asserting the limitations defense because it stipulated to a sixty-day extension of the pre-suit screening period required under section 766.106, Florida Statutes (1991). To repeat Judge Schwartz's famous quote, we will not countenance such "gotcha" maneuvers. Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 342 (Fla. 1979). We also reject the appellee's companion argument that its insurer had no authority to enter into the stipulation.
REVERSED.
LETTS, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 So. 2d 112, 1992 WL 68980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaszay-v-hb-corporation-fladistctapp-1992.