Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez

Supreme Court of Florida

Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez

921 So. 2d 572, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 2005 WL 3005556

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 2005

DocketNo. SC03-933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 921 So. 2d 572 (Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 921 So. 2d 572, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 2005 WL 3005556 (Fla. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction of this case based on express and direct conflict between the decision below, Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 841 So.2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and our decision in Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P., 835 So.2d 1091 (Fla.2002). A majority no longer exists, however, to retain jurisdiction and decide the case on the merits. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., dissent. CANTERO, J., dissents with an opinion. PARIENTE, C.J.; recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction of this case based on express and direct conflict between the decision below, Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 841 So.2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and our decision in Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P., 835 So.2d 1091 (Fla.2002). A majority no longer exists, however, to retain jurisdiction and decide the case on the merits. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., dissent. CANTERO, J., dissents with an opinion. PARIENTE, C.J.; recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 So. 2d 572, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 2005 WL 3005556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-lobo-de-gonzalez-fla-2005.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack