Jason Schmidt v. Leroy Kirkegard

615 F. App'x 449
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 2015
Docket14-35699
StatusUnpublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 449 (Jason Schmidt v. Leroy Kirkegard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jason Schmidt v. Leroy Kirkegard, 615 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Montana state prisoner Jason Lee Schmidt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the dismissal of a section 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust, see Rhoades v. Henry, 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th Cir.2011), and we affirm.

Schmidt contends that the district court should have excused the exhaustion requirement because of the Montana state court’s delay in addressing his petition for post-conviction relief. At the time the district court dismissed Schmidt’s federal petition, his amended state petition had only been pending for two months. On this record, Schmidt has not shown that the available state corrective process is ineffective. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(B); Coe v. Thurman, 922 F.2d 528, 530-31 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhoades v. Henry
638 F.3d 1027 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, Warden
922 F.2d 528 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
615 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jason-schmidt-v-leroy-kirkegard-ca9-2015.