Jaskoey v. Consolidated Gas Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaskoey v. Consolidated Gas Co.

33 Misc. 790, 67 N.Y.S. 976

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Misc. 790 (Jaskoey v. Consolidated Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaskoey v. Consolidated Gas Co., 33 Misc. 790, 67 N.Y.S. 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease must be affirmed on the authority of Wodroczka v. Consolidated Gas Co., 29 Misc. Rep. 637, which arose out of the same occurrence. A principal does not become liable for the acts of his contractor merely because he reserves the right of inspection as the work progresses. Kelly v. Mayor, 11 N. Y. 432.

Present: Giegebich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease must be affirmed on the authority of Wodroczka v. Consolidated Gas Co., 29 Misc. Rep. 637, which arose out of the same occurrence. A principal does not become liable for the acts of his contractor merely because he reserves the right of inspection as the work progresses. Kelly v. Mayor, 11 N. Y. 432.

Present: Giegebich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 790, 67 N.Y.S. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaskoey-v-consolidated-gas-co-nyappterm-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack